anti-slapp – Page 2 – Fraud Files Blog

I held out hope that Ashanti Hamilton was going to be one of the good guys. A guy who represented his constituents with integrity, and demanded the same of his colleagues.

I was wrong.

Here are his shameful words at a rally to support habitual criminal, Michael McGee Jr., as reported by 620 WTMJ Radio:

Fellow Milwaukee Alderman Ashanti Hamilton also spoke at the event, calling the McGee prosecutions evidence of “a system gone astray.”

“What we are witnessing now is a manifestation of the mistreatment of an elected official,” he said. “Let’s correct this, and let’s not stand to let our system of justice to be perverted, because it’s all of ours. If we don’t correct it, then we stand to be in that position, too.”

Ashanti – Stand up for your people. Demand more of your colleagues. And by all means, don’t defend this criminal whose prosecution is long overdue.

McGee blatantly violated the law on multiple occasions, and there is plenty of evidence. He doesn’t deserve bail in light of the crimes he has committed and the threats, intimidation, and coercion he’s involved in.

He doesn’t deserve to get a pass on prosecution. For you to claim that this is an injustice to McGee shows that you lack integrity as well.

I’m ashamed to admit you graduated from my Alma Mater.

Medifast Lawsuit: Anti-SLAPP Motions Filed
UPDATE: On February 17, 2010, Medifast Inc. filed suit in US District Court, Southern District of California, alleging defamation, violation of California Corporations Code, and unfair business practices. On March 29, 2011, Judge Janis Sammartino dismissed all of Medifast’s claims […]

read more
Medifast Lawyers Continue to Lie to the Court
UPDATE: On February 17, 2010, Medifast Inc. filed suit in US District Court, Southern District of California, alleging defamation, violation of California Corporations Code, and unfair business practices. On March 29, 2011, Judge Janis Sammartino dismissed all of Medifast’s claims […]

read more
Usana Health Sciences Loses Big in Court
Consequently, the evidence now indicates only that Defendants engaged in the lawful trading of securities. Because USANA did not meet its burden, the court strikes the second claim for relief under California’s anti-SLAPP statute. A ruling yesterday in the Usana […]

read more